Make delivery pay: 10 AI skills for takeaway and the apps

packaging-spec

food that arrives as you sent it, in packaging that is lawful

How the two work together

Claude thinks it through. Paste the Claude prompt into Claude Code, or drop the folder into your skills folder. Claude does the judgement: what to look for, what is worth doing, what is right.

Codex gets it done. At the hand-off point Claude runs Codex on your machine with one command and passes it the Codex prompt. Codex does the mechanical part and hands the result back. Claude checks it before you see it.

No API key to set up: Claude calls the Codex you already have installed. If Codex is not installed, Claude does that half itself and tells you.

Prompt for Claude

---
name: packaging-spec
description: Turns your current packaging list, your supplier invoices, your dish list and one measured delivery journey into a written packaging specification: every item checked against the England single-use plastics ban, every item checked as food contact safe, the right container matched to each dish with a held temperature, the tamper and label position settled, the cost per dish, the Extended Producer Responsibility threshold test answered, and a dated switching list. Use before you order another pallet of containers, or after a run of spilled, crushed or cold complaints you are paying for.
---

# A packaging specification that keeps the food intact, keeps you out of the plastics ban, and shows the cost of every lid

You give this the packaging you currently buy with its invoices, the dishes each item carries, the measured journey from your delivery-menu work and your supplier's product specifications. You get back a written specification: which of your current items are now unlawful to supply in England, which are food contact compliant and on what evidence, which container belongs on which dish and what temperature it holds, where the tamper seal and the allergen label go, the cost per dish, and a switching list with prices and dates. It will not tell you what packaging other venues use or what a typical packaging cost per order is. No published figure exists for a single independent UK venue, and buying to somebody else's spec is how a kitchen ends up with three thousand lids that do not fit.

## What it does

1. **List every item you actually buy, from the invoice and not from memory.** One row per item: the product name exactly as the supplier prints it, the material, the size, the pack quantity, the pack price, the invoice date and the supplier. Include the things nobody counts: the bag, the sticker, the cutlery set, the napkin, the sauce pot, the lid that is ordered separately from the base. Most venues discover at this step that they are buying two overlapping container ranges because somebody ordered in a hurry once, and the cost of that is visible only when the list is in one place.

2. **Check every item against the England single-use plastics ban before anything else, because an unlawful item is not a cost decision.** The Environmental Protection (Plastic Plates etc. and Polystyrene Containers etc.) (England) Regulations 2023 prohibit supplying single-use plastic plates, trays and bowls, single-use plastic cutlery, balloon sticks, and single-use polystyrene food or drink containers and cups. Single-use means an item "not designed or intended to be re-used". The offence provisions make a supplier "liable on summary conviction to a fine". Mark every item on your list as banned, exempt or not applicable, and name the regulation that decided it.

3. **Understand the packaging exemption properly, because it is the part owners get wrong in both directions.** Regulation 3 carries its own carve out: "Paragraph (1) does not apply to the supply of a single-use plastic plate, tray or bowl that is packaging." The GOV.UK guidance explains what that means in practice, that the exemption covers items which are "packaging, pre-filled or filled at the point of sale". So a plastic tray you fill with a curry and seal is packaging and is outside the plate, tray and bowl ban. A plastic plate you hand a customer to eat from is not. The polystyrene ban is different and narrower in a way that helps nobody in a takeaway: GOV.UK states that "Polystyrene boxes used to transport unprocessed or unprepared food through the supply chain are not banned", which is about the fish coming in, not the burger going out. Record the reasoning for every item rather than the conclusion alone.

4. **Confirm each item is fit to touch food, and keep the evidence.** Regulation 1935/2004 requires that materials and articles intended to come into contact with food be manufactured so that under normal or foreseeable use they do not transfer constituents to food in quantities which could "endanger human health", "bring about an unacceptable change in the composition of the food" or "bring about a deterioration in the organoleptic characteristics thereof". It also requires that "labelling, advertising and presentation of a material or article shall not mislead the consumers". Your evidence is the supplier's declaration of compliance and the product specification. Ask for it, file it with a date, and record any item for which you have nothing. This matters most on the items bought cheapest and thought about least, which are usually the hot lid and the sauce pot.

5. **Match a container to each dish against the measured journey, not against the dish size.** The delivery-menu skill produced a maximum journey time. Packaging is what decides whether a dish survives it. The Food Standards Agency states the requirement for both directions: "Food that needs refrigerating must be kept cool while being transported. This may need to be packed in an insulated box with a coolant gel or in a cool bag. Equally, food that needs to be kept hot should be packed in an insulated bag." Record for each dish the container, the lid, whether it vents, whether it is insulated, and the temperature the food actually held at the end of the measured journey when somebody tested it with a probe. A container chosen on capacity alone is a guess about physics.

6. **Decide the vent question dish by dish, because it is the trade off that decides whether food arrives soggy or cold.** A sealed container holds heat and traps steam. A vented container releases steam and loses heat. There is no container that does both, so the choice belongs to the dish: anything crisp is vented and anything wet, saucy or fragile is sealed, and a dish with both is split into two containers or taken off the menu by the delivery-menu skill. Record the decision and the reason on every row, because this is the single most common cause of a complaint that both the kitchen and the rider blame on the other.

7. **Settle the tamper seal, the label position and the allergen label in one pass.** The allergen answer at the door is a legal requirement covered by allergen-on-delivery, and the physical place it goes is a packaging decision made here. Decide where the sticker sits so that it seals the container and carries the information at once, and check that it does not cover a vent you just specified. Record which item carries the order number, which carries the allergen information, and which carries the tamper evidence, because if the answer is the same small sticker for all three you have a peeling label and no evidence of anything.

8. **Cost it per dish, and answer the Extended Producer Responsibility question with a yes or a no.** Divide the pack price by the pack quantity to a per unit pence figure with the invoice date attached, then attach the right items to each dish and add them up. On the waste side, a business is an obligated producer only where it "supplied or imported more than 25 tonnes of packaging in the UK in the previous year" and its "annual turnover worldwide was GBP 1 million or more". Record both figures and the conclusion. If you are over both, a small producer must "register with your environmental regulator", "report packaging data every year" and "keep required data for 7 years", and a large producer has further duties including recycling notes and a fee. The answer belongs in the file whichever way it goes.

9. **Hand the whole list to Codex to build the specification.** Every judgement is already made: the ban classification, the food contact evidence, the container match, the vent decision and the label positions are the owner's. Run:

   ```
   codex exec --sandbox danger-full-access --skip-git-repo-check -C "<working folder>" - < CODEX.md
   ```

   Claude hands over the item list with invoices, the ban classification with its reason, the food contact evidence references, the dish to container mapping with probe temperatures, the vent and seal decisions, the label positions and the two Extended Producer Responsibility figures. Codex returns the specification sheet, the unlawful item list, the cost per dish, the threshold test and a gaps file. Codex classifies nothing and costs nothing it was not given.

10. **Write the switching list, with prices, lead times and a date.** Anything marked unlawful, anything with no food contact evidence and anything that failed the probe test goes on a list with a proposed replacement, its supplier, its price and its lead time. Put the date every price was read in the footer and put a stock run out date against each item, because switching a container is not an instruction, it is a stock decision, and the worst version of this is running out of the new lid on a Friday while a pallet of the old one sits in the yard.

## Then it checks

1. Every packaging item on the list carries a supplier, a product name exactly as printed, a pack price, a pack quantity and an invoice date, and none is described only as a monthly spend.
2. Every item is classified against the England single-use plastics ban as banned, exempt or not applicable, and the regulation or guidance sentence that decided it is named on the row.
3. Every item has a recorded food contact evidence reference or is explicitly recorded as having none.
4. Every dish on the delivery menu has a container, a lid and a vented or sealed decision with its reason, and a probe temperature recorded at the end of the measured journey or an explicit note that none was taken.
5. The file records which item carries the order number, which carries the allergen information and which carries the tamper evidence, and states whether any label covers a vent.
6. The Extended Producer Responsibility test records both the tonnage figure and the turnover figure and reaches a stated conclusion from them, rather than a fee.

Any check fails: name it, redo that step once. Failed twice: say what is wrong and stop.

## Rules
- Public information only.
- Never invent a fact, a number or a quote.
- Anything sent in someone's name says whose name it is.
- Never state a typical packaging cost per order, a benchmark packaging share of revenue, or what packaging comparable venues use. No published figure exists for a single independent UK venue, the figures that circulate come from packaging suppliers, and an owner who buys to a borrowed spec buys containers that do not fit their own dishes.
- Never classify an item as exempt from the plastics ban because a supplier's website says so. The supplier is selling it. The classification comes from the Regulations and the GOV.UK guidance, and the sentence that decided it is written on the row.
- Never record a food contact material as compliant without a document. A supplier's verbal assurance is not a declaration of compliance, and the items with no paperwork are almost always the cheap ones in daily contact with hot food.
- Never specify a container from a catalogue photograph. The test is a filled container, the measured journey and a probe, and anything else is a hope with a product code.
- Never let one sticker carry the order number, the allergen information and the tamper seal. When it peels or is cut you lose all three at once, and one of the three is a legal duty.
- Never switch a packaging item without a stock run out date and a lead time. A correct specification that arrives after you have run out is an incorrect specification on the night.
- This output is a working document prepared for the owner to check with their packaging supplier on product specifications and declarations of compliance, their environmental health officer on food contact and temperature, their accountant on cost and any Extended Producer Responsibility duty, and their solicitor or trading standards officer on the plastics ban classification. It applies published rules to a draft specification. It is not legal advice and it is not a ruling that any item complies.

## Built from
- The Environmental Protection (Plastic Plates etc. and Polystyrene Containers etc.) (England) Regulations 2023, SI 2023/982, regulations 1 to 5, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2023/982/body/made, made 7 September 2023 and in force on the twenty fourth day after that day as regulation 1(2) provides, read 23 September 2026: the prohibitions, the single-use definition, the packaging exemption in regulation 3 and the fine on summary conviction, in steps 2 and 3.
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, "Single-use plastics ban: plates, bowls, trays, containers, cutlery and balloon sticks", https://www.gov.uk/guidance/single-use-plastics-ban-plates-bowls-trays-containers-cutlery-and-balloon-sticks, published 22 January 2024 and updated 7 October 2024, read 23 September 2026: the point of sale packaging wording, the single-use definition, the supply chain polystyrene carve out and the enforcement and inspection position, in steps 2 and 3.
- Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food, Article 3, as it applies in the United Kingdom, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2004/1935/article/3, read 23 September 2026: the general safety requirement and the non misleading presentation duty in step 4.
- Food Standards Agency and GOV.UK, "Food safety for food delivery", https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-safety-for-food-delivery/food-safety-for-food-delivery, published 26 March 2020, read 23 September 2026: the insulated box, coolant gel and insulated bag requirements and the cleaning between loads, in steps 5 and 6.
- The Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/2996, Schedule 4, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2996/schedule/4/made, read 23 September 2026: the 8 degree and 63 degree holding requirements that the probe test in step 5 is measured against.
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, "Extended producer responsibility for packaging: who is affected and what to do", https://www.gov.uk/guidance/extended-producer-responsibility-for-packaging-who-is-affected-and-what-to-do, updated 19 August 2026, read 23 September 2026: the 25 tonne and GBP 1 million thresholds and the small and large producer duties in step 8.
- HM Revenue and Customs, "Catering, takeaway food (VAT Notice 709/1)", https://www.gov.uk/guidance/catering-takeaway-food-and-vat-notice-7091, updated 8 June 2026, read 23 September 2026: the test that standard rates food "provided to a customer in packaging that retains heat", which is why every packaging change in step 5 is reported to the commission-maths file.
- Deliveroo, "Deliveroo Partners Terms and Conditions", https://merchants.deliveroo.com/en-GB/legal/terms, page states last updated 14 January 2021 with later dated sections, read 23 September 2026: the clause returning a temperature refund to the venue where the order "wasn't packaged in accordance with these terms", which is the commercial reason step 5 is evidenced with a probe.

Prompt for Codex

# packaging-spec

## You are given
The full packaging purchase list for one UK hospitality business, taken from supplier invoices, with for each item the product name exactly as the supplier prints it, the material, the size, the pack quantity, the pack price, the invoice date and the supplier name. The owner's classification of every item against the England single-use plastics ban, recorded as banned, exempt or not applicable, with the regulation or guidance sentence the owner relied on quoted exactly. The food contact evidence reference for every item, being the supplier declaration of compliance or product specification with its date, or the owner's explicit statement that none exists. The delivery dish list with the maximum measured journey time from the delivery-menu work. The owner's mapping of which container, lid, bag, sauce pot, cutlery set and label attaches to each dish. The owner's vented or sealed decision for every dish with the reason. The probe temperature recorded at the end of the measured journey for each dish, with the date it was taken, or the note that no probe test was performed. The owner's decision on which packaging item carries the order number, which carries the allergen information and which carries the tamper evidence, and whether any label covers a vent. The owner's figures for packaging tonnage supplied in the previous year and worldwide annual turnover. The proposed replacement item, supplier, price, lead time and stock run out date for anything the owner has decided to switch. All judgement calls, including every ban classification, every container match, every vent decision and every switch, have already been made by the owner and are supplied to you.

## Produce
Write into a `./packaging-spec-output/` folder:

1. `packaging-items.csv` with these columns in this order: `item_ref`, `product_name_verbatim`, `supplier`, `material`, `size`, `pack_quantity`, `pack_price_gbp`, `invoice_date`, `unit_cost_gbp`, `ban_classification`, `ban_reason_verbatim`, `food_contact_evidence`, `evidence_date`. `item_ref` is P001 upward. `ban_classification` is exactly one of `banned`, `exempt as packaging`, `exempt other`, `not applicable`, `not stated`. `food_contact_evidence` is exactly one of `declaration of compliance supplied`, `product specification supplied`, `none supplied`. `unit_cost_gbp` is `pack_price_gbp` divided by `pack_quantity` and is left empty where either input is missing.
2. `unlawful-items.csv` with columns: `item_ref`, `product_name_verbatim`, `supplier`, `ban_classification`, `ban_reason_verbatim`, `stock_on_hand_stated`, `replacement_item`, `replacement_supplier`, `replacement_price_gbp`, `lead_time_days`, `stock_run_out_date`. Only rows whose `ban_classification` is `banned` appear. Every row missing a replacement is listed in `gaps.md`.
3. `dish-packaging.csv` with columns: `dish_ref`, `dish_name_verbatim`, `container_item_ref`, `lid_item_ref`, `bag_item_ref`, `sauce_pot_item_ref`, `cutlery_item_ref`, `label_item_ref`, `vented_or_sealed`, `vent_reason_verbatim`, `insulated`, `probe_temperature_c`, `probe_taken_after_minutes`, `probe_date`. `vented_or_sealed` is exactly one of `vented`, `sealed`, `split into two containers`, `not stated`. `insulated` is `yes`, `no` or `not stated`. Every row with an empty `probe_temperature_c` is listed in `gaps.md`.
4. `label-positions.csv` with columns: `dish_ref`, `carries_order_number`, `carries_allergen_information`, `carries_tamper_evidence`, `same_label_for_all_three`, `label_covers_a_vent`. The first three columns hold an `item_ref` or `not stated`. `same_label_for_all_three` and `label_covers_a_vent` are `yes`, `no` or `not stated`. Every row where `same_label_for_all_three` is `yes` or `label_covers_a_vent` is `yes` is listed in `gaps.md`.
5. `packaging-cost-per-dish.csv` with columns: `dish_ref`, `dish_name_verbatim`, `container_cost_gbp`, `lid_cost_gbp`, `bag_cost_gbp`, `sauce_pot_cost_gbp`, `cutlery_cost_gbp`, `label_cost_gbp`, `total_packaging_cost_gbp`, `costing_complete`. `costing_complete` is `yes` or `no`, and is `no` wherever any attached item has an empty `unit_cost_gbp`.
6. `epr-threshold-test.md` recording, on separate lines and nothing else: the packaging tonnage supplied in the previous year as the owner stated it; whether that is more than 25 tonnes; the worldwide annual turnover as the owner stated it; whether that is GBP 1 million or more; and the resulting conclusion stated as `obligated producer`, `not obligated on tonnage`, `not obligated on turnover` or `not stated`. Every line names where the figure came from.
7. `switching-list.csv` with columns: `item_ref`, `product_name_verbatim`, `reason_for_switch`, `replacement_item`, `replacement_supplier`, `replacement_unit_cost_gbp`, `current_unit_cost_gbp`, `unit_cost_difference_gbp`, `lead_time_days`, `stock_run_out_date`, `order_by_date`. `reason_for_switch` is exactly one of `banned in England`, `no food contact evidence`, `failed probe test`, `owner decision`, `not stated`. `order_by_date` is `stock_run_out_date` minus `lead_time_days` and is left empty where either input is missing.
8. `gaps.md` a numbered list of: every item with no invoice date or pack quantity; every item classified `not stated` against the ban; every item with no food contact evidence; every dish with no probe temperature; every dish with `vented_or_sealed` recorded as `not stated`; every row where one label carries all three functions or covers a vent; every banned item with no replacement; every switching row with no order by date; and any figure the owner supplied without a date.

## Rules
- Codex tabulates, calculates, sorts and records. It never classifies an item against the plastics ban, never decides whether a material is food contact safe, never chooses a container, never decides vented or sealed, and never decides to switch an item. Those were supplied.
- Never estimate a missing number. An item with no pack quantity has an empty unit cost and a line in `gaps.md`. A dish with any uncosted attached item reports `costing_complete` as `no` rather than a partial total presented as a full one.
- Never write a typical packaging cost per order, a benchmark packaging share of revenue, a comparison with other venues or any industry figure into any file. No such figure exists for a single independent UK venue and none is to be recorded.
- Never treat a supplier's marketing claim as a ban classification or as food contact evidence. Only the owner's supplied classification with its quoted regulation sentence, and a dated declaration of compliance or product specification, are recorded as such.
- Never infer a probe temperature from a container's insulation claim. An empty probe cell stays empty and is recorded in `gaps.md`.
- Never quietly reconcile an item that appears twice under different product names. Record both rows as supplied and list the suspected duplicate in `gaps.md` for the owner to resolve.
- Use British English, GBP written as `GBP` or the pound sign, DD Month YYYY dates, and temperatures written in degrees Celsius. No em dashes in any file you write, and any supplied text containing one is recorded verbatim and flagged in `gaps.md`.
- Every product name, supplier name, reason and quoted regulation sentence is copied exactly as supplied, including its punctuation and capitalisation.
- Every file ends with this line: this is a working document prepared for the owner to check with their packaging supplier on specifications and declarations of compliance, their environmental health officer on food contact and temperature, their accountant on cost and any producer responsibility duty, and their solicitor or trading standards officer on the plastics ban classification. It applies supplied rules to a draft specification and is not legal advice or a ruling that any item complies.

## Return
The absolute path of every file written, the row count of each CSV, the total number of packaging items listed, the number classified `banned` and their product names, the number with no food contact evidence and their product names, the number of dishes with no probe temperature, the number of dishes where one label carries all three functions, the total packaging cost per dish for each dish or the word incomplete, the conclusion recorded in `epr-threshold-test.md` stated in full with the two figures it rests on, the earliest `order_by_date` on the switching list, and the `gaps.md` item count.

Built from the best public work on this

Sources for packaging-spec

Everything below was opened and read on 23 September 2026. Nothing is cited that could not be loaded.

1. The Environmental Protection (Plastic Plates etc. and Polystyrene Containers etc.) (England) Regulations 2023

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2023/982/body/made, SI 2023/982, made 7 September 2023, read 23 September 2026. Regulation 1(2) provides that the Regulations "come into force on the twenty-fourth day after the day on which they are made", which from a made date of 7 September 2023 gives 1 October 2023. That date is arithmetic from the instrument itself and is recorded here as such rather than taken from a secondary report.

Regulation 3 prohibits the supply of single-use plastic plates, trays and bowls to end users. Regulations 4 and 5 do the same for single-use plastic cutlery and balloon sticks, and for single-use polystyrene food or drink containers and cups. Regulation 2 defines the items as those "not designed or intended to be re-used", which is the definition step 2 applies rather than an opinion about how sturdy a container feels.

The exemption that decides most takeaway questions sits inside regulation 3: "Paragraph (1) does not apply to the supply of a single-use plastic plate, tray or bowl that is packaging."

The enforcement position is stated in regulations 3(4), 4(2) and 5(2), where an offender is "liable on summary conviction to a fine".

Where the skill departs: the Regulations apply in England only, and the skill says so rather than implying a United Kingdom rule. Wales has its own primary legislation in the Environmental Protection (Single-use Plastic Products) (Wales) Act 2023, and Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own instruments. None of those was opened for this skill, so none is cited and an owner outside England is told to check their own nation's rules rather than being given a wrong answer with confidence.

2. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, "Single-use plastics ban: plates, bowls, trays, containers, cutlery and balloon sticks"

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/single-use-plastics-ban-plates-bowls-trays-containers-cutlery-and-balloon-sticks, published 22 January 2024 and updated 7 October 2024, read 23 September 2026. The page states that it "Applies to England".

This is the operational companion to the Regulations and it answers the question owners actually ask, which is whether the tray they seal a curry into is caught. The guidance describes the exemption in the words the skill uses in step 3: the ban does not apply where "the items are packaging, pre-filled or filled at the point of sale". It repeats the statutory definition of single-use, that "A product is single-use if it is not designed or intended for reuse."

It also closes off a misreading of the polystyrene ban that costs owners money in the wrong direction: "Polystyrene boxes used to transport unprocessed or unprepared food through the supply chain are not banned." That sentence is about a fish box arriving at the back door, not about a burger going out of the front, and a venue that reads it as a general exemption will keep supplying banned containers.

On enforcement the guidance states that "Local authorities will carry out inspections to make sure the rules are being followed" and that "If you break the law, you could be fined and ordered to cover the cost of the investigation".

Where the skill departs: the guidance sets out the items in scope and the materials tests at a level of detail the skill does not reproduce, including the definitions of expanded and extruded polystyrene. The skill records the owner's classification and the sentence they relied on, so that a trading standards officer can see the reasoning. It does not classify anything itself, because a classification made from a product name rather than a product is a guess.

3. Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004, Article 3, as it applies in the United Kingdom

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2004/1935/article/3, read 23 September 2026.

Step 4 is the step owners skip, because packaging that arrives in a box with a picture of a fork on it looks like it has already been checked by somebody. Article 3 sets the requirement: materials and articles must be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practice so that, under normal or foreseeable conditions of use, they do not transfer their constituents to food in quantities which could "endanger human health", "bring about an unacceptable change in the composition of the food" or "bring about a deterioration in the organoleptic characteristics thereof".

The third of those is the one that connects this skill to delivery-menu. An unacceptable deterioration in organoleptic characteristics is a legal way of saying the food tastes of the container, which is also a complaint, a refund and a review.

Article 3 also requires that "labelling, advertising and presentation of a material or article shall not mislead the consumers", which is why a supplier's claim on a website is not the evidence. The evidence is a declaration of compliance, and the skill asks for one with a date.

Where the skill departs: the Regulation sets out the framework for specific measures, for active and intelligent materials, and for traceability through the supply chain, and the skill teaches none of it. It records whether a document exists for each item. An owner with no document for a hot lid is told to ask the supplier, which is a five minute job that almost nobody has done.

4. Food Standards Agency and GOV.UK, "Food safety for food delivery"

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-safety-for-food-delivery/food-safety-for-food-delivery, published 26 March 2020, read 23 September 2026.

This supplies the plain requirement behind steps 5 and 6: "Food that needs refrigerating must be kept cool while being transported. This may need to be packed in an insulated box with a coolant gel or in a cool bag. Equally, food that needs to be kept hot should be packed in an insulated bag."

It adds the cleaning rule that applies to reusable carriers and to any vehicle: "If vehicles or containers have been used for transporting anything other than food, effective cleaning is required between loads to avoid the risk of contamination."

And it supplies the instruction that the label and container decisions in step 7 have to respect: businesses "should also identify and remove possible cross-contamination risks in the delivery process", including "storing allergen-free meals separately in transit to avoid contamination through any spillages".

Where the skill departs: the guidance is short and does not state temperatures, delivery time limits, driver hygiene requirements or tamper evidence expectations, and the skill says so rather than borrowing authority it does not have. The temperature figures in this skill come from Schedule 4 of the 2013 Regulations, and the tamper seal decision is a commercial and practical one that no source here mandates.

5. The Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013, Schedule 4

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2996/schedule/4/made, read 23 September 2026.

The probe test in step 5 needs something to be measured against, and this is it. Paragraph 2(1) makes it an offence to keep food "at or in food premises at a temperature above 8°C" where chill holding applies. Paragraph 6 makes it an offence to keep at a temperature "below 63°C" food which "needs to be kept at or above 63°C in order to control the growth of pathogenic micro-organisms or the formation of toxins". Paragraph 5(1) permits a service period "of less than four hours" above 8°C and paragraph 7(2) permits a period "of less than two hours" below 63°C for food not previously held for service.

The skill uses these as the reference for the recorded probe temperature. It does not use them to assert that a particular container complies, because compliance depends on the food, the ambient temperature, the journey and the day, all of which vary.

Where the skill departs: the Regulations govern far more than temperature, and the skill takes only the holding figures. It also does not state that a probe reading inside the tolerances makes a container acceptable. It records the number and the minutes it was taken at, and leaves the judgement to the owner and their environmental health officer.

6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, "Extended producer responsibility for packaging: who is affected and what to do"

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/extended-producer-responsibility-for-packaging-who-is-affected-and-what-to-do, updated 19 August 2026, read 23 September 2026.

Step 8 answers a question owners worry about and usually do not need to. The guidance sets two thresholds that must both be crossed: an obligated producer "supplied or imported more than 25 tonnes of packaging in the UK in the previous year" and had "annual turnover worldwide was GBP 1 million or more", and is established in the United Kingdom.

Above the thresholds the duty splits. A small producer must "register with your environmental regulator", "report packaging data every year" and "keep required data for 7 years". A large producer must additionally "buy or otherwise acquire enough packaging waste recycling notes (PRNs)" and "pay a waste disposal fee for any household packaging to PackUK each year".

The guidance also defines who counts as a producer through the activities performed, including "packing goods or filling packaging" and "selling filled packaging to an end user", which is what a takeaway does on every order.

Where the skill departs: the guidance covers material categories, recyclability assessments and the reporting calendar in detail, and the skill teaches none of it. The output is a yes or no with the two figures behind it, never a fee, because the fee depends on tonnage and material data the owner has not yet gathered. An owner who comes out as obligated is told to take the conclusion to their accountant and the environmental regulator.

7. HM Revenue and Customs, "Catering, takeaway food (VAT Notice 709/1)"

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/catering-takeaway-food-and-vat-notice-7091, updated 8 June 2026, read 23 September 2026.

This is cited in a packaging skill for one reason, and it is a reason owners find surprising. One of the five tests that standard rates hot takeaway food is that the food is "provided to a customer in packaging that retains heat, or in any other packaging that is specifically designed for hot food". A packaging decision made purely for food quality can therefore move a dish between VAT treatments, and the venue will not notice until a return is prepared.

The skill does not rule on VAT. It requires every packaging change to be reported into the commission-maths file, where the owner's VAT decision is recorded against each dish with the test that decided it.

Where the skill departs: the Notice covers the whole of catering and takeaway VAT and the skill uses one test from it, as a trigger to notify rather than as a conclusion.

8. Deliveroo, "Deliveroo Partners Terms and Conditions"

https://merchants.deliveroo.com/en-GB/legal/terms, page states last updated 14 January 2021 with later dated sections, read 23 September 2026.

The commercial argument for spending money on packaging sits in one bracketed clause. Deliveroo covers a refund where the order was "not an appropriate temperature for consumption on delivery where the Delivery Services took more than 15 minutes", but the cover is withdrawn "except where the Delivery Order wasn't packaged in accordance with these terms". Otherwise, refunds "for which you are responsible under our Complaints Matrix will be deducted from our payment to you".

So packaging is the thing that decides who pays for a cold dinner, and a venue with no probe record has no answer when the cost is deducted. That is why step 5 evidences the container with a temperature rather than a specification sheet.

Where the skill departs: the terms also govern commission, price parity, order accuracy and termination, used in commission-maths, order-accuracy and platform-listing. Only the packaging exception is taken here, and it is taken as a commercial reason for evidence rather than as a rule about packaging.

The best public prompt found

The closest public artefact is the `vendor-review` skill in Anthropic's `knowledge-work-plugins` repository, raw source at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/main/operations/skills/vendor-review/SKILL.md, loaded successfully on 23 September 2026. The repository star count was read from https://api.github.com/repos/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins on 23 September 2026 and was 25,463.

Its useful half is total cost of ownership rather than unit price. It asks for "Total cost of ownership (not just license fees)", for implementation costs, for ongoing costs and, best of all, for "Exit costs (data migration, contract termination)". Translated into packaging, the exit cost is the pallet of the old lid sitting in the yard, and that is precisely why step 10 of our skill carries a stock run out date and an order by date rather than a switching instruction. The public skill also asks for "Concentration risk (single vendor dependency)", which is a real hazard for a venue whose entire container range comes from one supplier with a lead time.

What we deliberately did not copy. It has no concept of a legal floor. A vendor review that scores containers on price, quality and support would happily recommend an item that has been unlawful to supply in England since 2023, because nothing in its framework asks whether the product may be sold at all. It also assesses vendors rather than items, and a packaging decision is item by item and dish by dish: one supplier can be right for the sauce pot and wrong for the hot lid. And its evidence standard is a proposal document, where the only evidence that settles a packaging argument here is a probe reading taken from a filled container at the end of a real journey.

No public prompt was found that specifies food delivery packaging against United Kingdom law. Searches covered `anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins` and `anthropics/skills` through api.github.com and a GitHub repository search for hospitality and restaurant skills, which returned 85,831 loosely matching repositories and nothing addressing this job.

Want this running in your business?

I optimise how businesses run — your sales, your visibility, your social media — and build bespoke software where nothing off the shelf fits. The first conversation is free. Work starts from £150 a day.