Make the bar pay: 10 AI skills for the drinks side
drinks-promo-law
run a drinks offer without breaching your licence
How the two work together
Claude thinks it through. Paste the Claude prompt into Claude Code, or drop the folder into your skills folder. Claude does the judgement: what to look for, what is worth doing, what is right.
Codex gets it done. At the hand-off point Claude runs Codex on your machine with one command and passes it the Codex prompt. Codex does the mechanical part and hands the result back. Claude checks it before you see it.
No API key to set up: Claude calls the Codex you already have installed. If Codex is not installed, Claude does that half itself and tells you.
Prompt for Claude
--- name: drinks-promo-law description: Takes a drinks offer you are about to run and tests it against the five activities the mandatory licence conditions prohibit, the price floor set by duty plus VAT, and the advertising rules on promotions, then returns the offer with the parts that breach struck out, the rule that struck each one, and wording you can actually put on the board. Use before a bottomless brunch, a two for one, a happy hour, a prize draw or anything with the word unlimited in it. --- # Run the offer, keep the licence You give this the offer in your own words, the mechanic, the hours, the drinks it covers, the price, and any wording or artwork already drafted. You get back one dated file: the offer restated precisely, a test against each of the five prohibited activities with the statutory wording beside it, the permitted price floor for every drink in the offer, the promotional wording rewritten or struck with the rule that struck it, and a numbered list of what must change before it runs. It will not tell you the offer is lawful, because that is your licensing officer's call and your solicitor's, and it says so on the front page. ## What it does 1. **Restate the offer in one sentence, then list the mechanic separately.** What is being sold, to whom, between which hours, on which days, at what price, for how long the promotion runs, and what the customer has to do to get it. The mechanic is the part that breaches, not the discount: "two for one" is a mechanic, "£4 pints" is a price. Then list every drink the offer touches with its ABV and serve size, because steps 6 and 7 need them. An offer described loosely passes every test here and fails the only one that matters, which is the one applied by somebody standing in your bar on a Friday night. 2. **Test it against the first prohibited activity: speed and quantity drinking games.** The mandatory condition, as substituted with effect from 1 October 2014, prohibits "games or other activities which require or encourage, or are designed to require or encourage, individuals to (i) drink a quantity of alcohol within a time limit (other than to drink alcohol sold or supplied on the premises before the cessation of the period in which the responsible person is authorised to sell or supply alcohol), or (ii) drink as much alcohol as possible (whether within a time limit or otherwise)". The Home Office guidance names the obvious case, "organised 'drink downing' competitions", and rescues the ordinary one: this "would not prevent the responsible person from requiring all drinks to be consumed or abandoned at, or before, the closing time of the premises". 3. **Test the second: unlimited or unspecified quantities.** The condition prohibits "provision of unlimited or unspecified quantities of alcohol free or for a fixed or discounted fee to the public or to a group defined by a particular characteristic in a manner which carries a significant risk of undermining a licensing objective". Two things in that sentence do work. "A group defined by a particular characteristic" catches free drinks for women before nine. And the qualifier at the end is real: the guidance says "A common sense approach is encouraged, which may include specifying the quantity of alcohol included in it or not targeting a group which could become more vulnerable or present a greater risk of crime and disorder as a result of excessive alcohol consumption." The fix for a bottomless offer is usually to specify the quantity rather than to cancel it. 4. **Test the third and fourth: prizes, and posters.** The condition prohibits "provision of free or discounted alcohol or any other thing as a prize to encourage or reward the purchase and consumption of alcohol over a period of 24 hours or less in a manner which carries a significant risk of undermining a licensing objective", and the guidance gives worked examples: "'Buy one and get two free' and 'Buy one cocktail and get a second cocktail for 25p'". Separately it prohibits "selling or supplying alcohol in association with promotional posters or flyers on, or in the vicinity of, the premises which can reasonably be considered to condone, encourage or glamorise anti social behaviour or to refer to the effects of drunkenness in any favourable manner". The A-board is part of the offer, and it is the part still outside at eleven when nobody is checking it. 5. **Test the fifth, and the two conditions that sit beside these.** The fifth prohibited activity is "dispensing alcohol directly by one person into the mouth of another (other than where that other person is unable to drink without assistance by reason of disability)", which the guidance illustrates with "drinking games such as the 'dentist's chair'" and adds that it "may also prevent a premises from allowing another body to promote its products by employing someone to dispense alcohol directly into customers' mouths". Then two conditions that apply whatever the offer: free potable water on request where it is reasonably available, and the requirement that half pints, 25ml or 35ml spirit measures and 125ml wine be available, displayed in printed material, and mentioned to a customer who does not specify a size. 6. **Set the price floor, per drink, before you agree the discount.** A separate mandatory condition provides that "no alcohol is sold or supplied for consumption on or off the premises for a price which is less than the permitted price", and defines the permitted price by a formula in which "D is the amount of duty chargeable in relation to the alcohol" and "V is the rate of value added tax chargeable", with the result "rounded up to the nearest penny". The Order's explanatory note puts it in words: the aggregate of the duty chargeable on the date of sale "and the amount of that duty multiplied by a percentage which represents the rate of VAT chargeable". The guidance confirms promotions themselves are fine: "It is still permitted to sell alcohol using promotions (as long as they are compatible with any other licensing condition that may be in force), and the relevant person should ensure that the price of the alcohol is not less than the permitted price." Where duty or VAT changes, the permitted price should reflect the new rates within fourteen days. 7. **Now test the advertising, which is a separate regulator with separate teeth.** CAP Code rule 18.10 states that "Marketing communications that include a promotion must not imply, condone or encourage excessive consumption of alcohol", and rule 18.1 that they "must be socially responsible and must contain nothing that is likely to lead people to adopt styles of drinking that are unwise". CAP's own advice on alcohol promotions adds the promotional rule 8.5, "Promotions must not be socially undesirable to the audience addressed by encouraging excessive consumption or irresponsible use", and reports an upheld 2018 ruling about a restaurant menu's "barrow of booze" where "a party of 15 equated to 12 units per person in one sitting, which the ASA considered excessive when taking official health guidelines into account". Do that arithmetic for your own offer before somebody else does. 8. **Read the wording for what it implies, not for what it says.** A single word can carry the breach. In its ruling on Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits, published 1 April 2026, the ASA considered a bus stop poster stating "FIREBALL" and "GO FOR THE DOUBLE!" beside a dartboard and two full shot glasses. The advertiser's defence was that the phrase was a darts expression. The ASA upheld the complaint: "We considered that 'double' was a widely used term in relation to spirits, and that most consumers would commonly understand that it referred to a double measurement of alcohol", and concluded that "Regardless of the number of units being consumed, we considered that the overall impression encouraged excessive drinking." Test every headline the same way: what is the second meaning, and does the second meaning sell a bigger drink. 9. **Finish with the things that are not in the mandatory conditions at all, and date the file.** Three of them. Promotional terms belong to Section 8 of the CAP Code, so the closing date, the entry restrictions and availability all have to be stated and honoured. The rules are different in Scotland and Northern Ireland: CAP records that "The Alcohol etc. (Scotland) Act 2010 introduced a number of restrictions on discounts and special offers related to alcohol products", that "from 6 April 2023, marketers in Northern Ireland are not able to offer loyalty schemes (collection or redemption of points) on alcohol (0.5% ABV or above)", and that promoters "are urged to seek legal advice" on both. And if the offer involves a producer's branding, the Portman Group Code reaches retailer activity where it is "part of any co-promotional activity that has the approval or support of the producer". Date the file, name who signed it off, and keep the artwork with it. ## Then it checks 1. The offer is restated in one sentence with the mechanic listed separately, and every drink it covers appears with its ABV and serve size. 2. Each of the five prohibited activities has an explicit pass or fail against this offer, with the statutory wording quoted beside the fail, and no activity is left unaddressed. 3. Every drink in the offer has a permitted price figure with the duty and VAT rates used, and the offer price is shown against it, with any offer price below the floor struck rather than flagged. 4. Every piece of wording and artwork in the offer, including the A-board, the tap card, the table card and the social post, has been read and recorded, and every struck sentence carries the rule or ruling number that struck it. 5. The file states the maximum number of units the offer invites one customer to drink, with the arithmetic shown, and states which drinks and serve sizes that figure assumes. 6. The file names the nation the premises is in, and where it is Scotland or Northern Ireland it says the offer has not been tested against that nation's own restrictions and must be before it runs. Any check fails: name it, redo that step once. Failed twice: say what is wrong and stop. ## Rules - Public information only. - Never invent a fact, a number or a quote. - Anything sent in someone's name says whose name it is. - Never tell an owner that an offer is lawful, compliant, or that it will not attract a review. The mandatory conditions are enforced by the licensing authority and the police, breach of a licence condition is a criminal offence, and an owner told "you are fine" by a document stops asking the people who could actually tell them. - Never fix a breach by rewording the advertisement while leaving the mechanic in place. If the offer encourages people to drink a lot quickly, changing the poster changes the evidence, not the offer. - Never state a redemption rate, an uplift figure, a typical spend per head on promotions or any other benchmark. No such figure exists for one independent venue. - Never design an offer around a quantity that has not been specified. "Unlimited", "as much as you like", "bottomless" and "free bar" all need a stated quantity, a stated time, or both, before they go anywhere near a board. - Never treat a producer's own artwork as pre-cleared. Where it carries the producer's approval or support it is co-promotional activity, and the venue is still the one whose name is on the licence. - This output is a working document prepared for the owner's licensing officer, solicitor or trade body to check before the offer runs. It applies published licence conditions and published advertising rules to a draft offer; it is not legal advice, it is not a licensing decision, and it does not certify compliance with anything. ## Built from - The Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) (Amendment) Order 2014, SI 2014/2440, Schedule, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2440/made, made 11 September 2014 and in force 1 October 2014, read 16 September 2026: the substituted Schedule quoted in steps 2 to 5, which is the current wording of the five prohibited activities, the water condition and the measures condition. - The Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Conditions) Order 2014, SI 2014/1252, Schedule, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1252/made, made 14 May 2014, read 16 September 2026: the permitted price condition, the duty plus VAT formula, the rounding rule and the fourteen day rule in step 6. - Home Office, "Revised guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 (September 2026) - accessible version", https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/explanatory-memorandum-revised-guidance-issued-under-s-182-of-licensing-act-2003/revised-guidance-issued-under-section-182-of-the-licensing-act-2003-september-2026-accessible-version, page published 13 October 2014 and last updated 15 September 2026, read 16 September 2026: paragraphs 10.39 to 10.44 on drinking games, quantities, prizes, posters and dispensing into the mouth, and 10.73 on promotions and the permitted price. - Committee of Advertising Practice, CAP Code (Edition 12), Section 18 "Alcohol", https://www.asa.org.uk/type/non_broadcast/code_section/18.html, no publication date shown on the page, read 16 September 2026: rules 18.1 and 18.10 in step 7. - Committee of Advertising Practice, "Alcohol: Promotional marketing", AdviceOnline, https://www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/alcohol-promotional-marketing.html, dated 28 July 2025 on the page, read 16 September 2026: rule 8.5, the Epic Pub Company twelve units example in step 7, and the Scotland and Northern Ireland restrictions in step 9. - Advertising Standards Authority, "ASA Ruling on Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits", complaint ref A26-1325564, https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/sazerac-uk-ltd-a26-1325564-sazerac-uk-ltd.html, published 1 April 2026, ad seen January 2026, read 16 September 2026: the double entendre reasoning and the overall impression test in step 8. - The Portman Group, "Code of Practice on the Naming, Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks, Sixth Edition (Amended)", https://portmangroup21.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Portman-Group-NPP-Sixth-Edition-Amended.pdf, no publication date shown on the document, read 16 September 2026: paragraph 1.4 and definition 2.4 on co-promotional activity in step 9.
Prompt for Codex
# drinks-promo-law ## You are given One drinks offer for a UK hospitality venue, described in the owner's own words, together with the mechanic, the days and hours it runs, the first and last dates, and the price. A list of every drink the offer covers, each with its ABV, serve size in millilitres or pints, full price and offer price. Every piece of wording and artwork drafted for the offer, exactly as it will appear, with a note of where each will be displayed. The nation the premises is in. The statutory wording of the five prohibited activities, the water condition, the measures condition and the permitted price condition, supplied as text. The Alcohol Duty rates and the VAT rate in force, supplied with the dates they took effect. The advertising rule numbers and rule text, supplied. And, once the judgement has been made, Claude's pass or fail against each prohibited activity, the struck sentences with the rule that struck each, and any approved replacement wording. ## Produce Write into a `./drinks-promo-law-output/` folder: 1. `offer-statement.md` with exactly six lines: the offer in one sentence as supplied, the mechanic, the days and hours, the first and last date, the nation, and the person who signed it off. Copied verbatim from the input. Any line with nothing supplied is written as the literal text `not supplied` and listed in `gaps.md`. 2. `prohibited-activity-tests.csv` with these columns in this order: `test_no`, `prohibited_activity_name`, `statutory_wording_verbatim`, `result`, `what_in_the_offer_triggers_it`, `qualifier_applies`. Exactly five rows, in this order of `prohibited_activity_name`: `speed or quantity drinking games`, `unlimited or unspecified quantities`, `free or discounted alcohol or other thing as a prize`, `posters or flyers condoning or glamorising`, `dispensing directly into the mouth`. `result` is exactly one of `pass`, `fail`, `cannot test`. `qualifier_applies` is exactly one of `significant risk of undermining a licensing objective`, `not qualified`, `not applicable`. 3. `price-floor.csv` with columns: `drink_no`, `drink_name`, `abv_percent`, `serve_ml`, `litres_of_pure_alcohol_in_serve`, `duty_rate_gbp_per_litre_alcohol`, `duty_in_serve_gbp`, `vat_rate_percent`, `permitted_price_gbp`, `full_price_gbp`, `offer_price_gbp`, `offer_price_below_permitted_price`, `rates_effective_date`. `permitted_price_gbp` is the duty in the serve plus that duty multiplied by the VAT rate, rounded up to the nearest penny. `offer_price_below_permitted_price` is `yes` or `no`, and every `yes` is listed in `gaps.md`. 4. `wording-check.csv` with columns: `item_no`, `where_it_will_appear`, `wording_verbatim`, `second_meaning_noted`, `trigger`, `rule_or_ruling_cited`, `status`. `trigger` is exactly one of `implies, condones or encourages excessive consumption`, `refers to the effects of drunkenness favourably`, `condones or glamorises anti-social behaviour`, `promotes a larger measure as preferable`, `unspecified quantity`, `no closing date stated`, `no entry restriction stated`, `appeals to under 18s`, `no trigger found`. `status` is exactly `kept` or `struck`, and every `struck` row carries a non-empty `rule_or_ruling_cited`. 5. `units-exposure.md` showing, for the offer as written, the maximum number of UK units one customer is invited to consume, with the arithmetic shown line by line, the drinks and serve sizes it assumes, and the duration over which it assumes they are consumed. Units are ABV multiplied by millilitres divided by 1000. Nothing in this file is compared to any guideline figure unless that figure was supplied. 6. `changes-required.md` as a numbered list of every change that must be made before the offer runs, each naming the file and row it came from, the rule or condition behind it, and the approved replacement wording where Claude supplied one. Where no replacement was supplied the item says so and the entry is repeated in `gaps.md`. 7. `gaps.md` with a numbered list of: every prohibited activity test marked `cannot test` and what input was missing; every drink with no ABV or no serve size; every drink priced below the permitted price; every struck sentence with no rule cited; every change with no approved replacement wording; the fact if the nation is Scotland or Northern Ireland and the offer has not been tested against that nation's own restrictions; and any artwork listed in the offer that was not supplied for checking. ## Rules - Codex tests, calculates, records and lists. It never decides whether the offer is lawful, never writes replacement wording, never softens a struck sentence, and never marks a `fail` as a `pass` because a change has been proposed. - Never write the words lawful, compliant, approved, cleared or safe to run into any file, about the offer or about any part of it. - Never leave a prohibited activity untested. Where the input is missing, the result is `cannot test` and the missing input is named, never `pass`. - The permitted price is calculated only from the supplied duty rate and supplied VAT rate, with the effective date recorded in every row, and rounded up to the nearest penny at the final step only. Never use a remembered rate and never round down. - Never write a redemption rate, an uplift figure, a typical spend per head or any promotional benchmark. No such figure exists for one independent venue and none is to appear in any file. - Every quoted sentence of the offer's own wording is copied exactly, including its punctuation, capitalisation and any emoji, and is never corrected, shortened or tidied. - Artwork that was named but not supplied is recorded as unchecked in `gaps.md`, never assumed to be acceptable. - Use British English, GBP and DD Month YYYY dates. No em dashes in any file you write, and any supplied wording containing one is recorded verbatim and flagged in `gaps.md`. - Every file ends with this line: this is a working document prepared for the owner's licensing officer, solicitor or trade body to check before the offer runs. It applies supplied licence conditions and supplied advertising rules to a draft offer and is not legal advice, a licensing decision or a certificate of compliance. ## Return The absolute path of each file written, the row count of each CSV, the result of each of the five prohibited activity tests with the trigger named for every fail, the number of drinks in the offer and how many are priced below the permitted price with the shortfall in pence for each, the number of wording items checked and the number struck with the trigger breakdown, the maximum units figure from `units-exposure.md` with the assumptions it used, the nation recorded in `offer-statement.md`, the count of changes required and how many have no approved replacement wording, and the `gaps.md` item count.
Built from the best public work on this
Sources for drinks-promo-law
Everything below was opened and read on 16 September 2026. Nothing is cited that could not be loaded.
1. The Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) (Amendment) Order 2014, SI 2014/2440
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2440/made, made 11 September 2014, coming into force 1 October 2014, read 16 September 2026.
This is the current wording of the irresponsible promotions condition, and reading the 2010 Order instead is the commonest mistake made about it. Article 2(3) provides "For the Schedule substitute the Schedule set out in the Schedule to this Order", so the 2010 text still circulating in trade summaries has been replaced since 1 October 2014. The substituted paragraph 1(1) requires that "The responsible person must ensure that staff on relevant premises do not carry out, arrange or participate in any irresponsible promotions in relation to the premises", and paragraph 1(2) defines an irresponsible promotion as any of five activities "or substantially similar activities, carried on for the purpose of encouraging the sale or supply of alcohol for consumption on the premises". They are: "(a) games or other activities which require or encourage, or are designed to require or encourage, individuals to (i) drink a quantity of alcohol within a time limit... or (ii) drink as much alcohol as possible (whether within a time limit or otherwise)"; "(b) provision of unlimited or unspecified quantities of alcohol free or for a fixed or discounted fee to the public or to a group defined by a particular characteristic in a manner which carries a significant risk of undermining a licensing objective"; "(c) provision of free or discounted alcohol or any other thing as a prize to encourage or reward the purchase and consumption of alcohol over a period of 24 hours or less in a manner which carries a significant risk of undermining a licensing objective"; "(d) selling or supplying alcohol in association with promotional posters or flyers on, or in the vicinity of, the premises which can reasonably be considered to condone, encourage or glamorise anti social behaviour or to refer to the effects of drunkenness in any favourable manner"; and "(e) dispensing alcohol directly by one person into the mouth of another (other than where that other person is unable to drink without assistance by reason of disability)".
Three differences from the old text matter and are why the skill quotes this version. Dispensing into the mouth used to be a free-standing condition and is now the fifth prohibited activity. The qualifier "in a manner which carries a significant risk of undermining a licensing objective" now attaches to (b) and (c) specifically rather than to the definition as a whole, so speed drinking games and drunkenness-glamorising posters are prohibited without any risk test at all, while an unlimited offer and a prize are judged against the objectives. And the old carve-out for promotions at a table meal, defined by section 159 of the Act, has gone: article 3 preserved it only for tickets bought on or before 30 September 2014 for activities taking place on or before 5 April 2015. A bottomless brunch is not saved by being served with food.
Where the skill departs: the substituted paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, on free potable water, age verification and small measures, are used only as context in step 5 and are treated fully in other skills in this pack.
2. The Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Conditions) Order 2014, SI 2014/1252
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1252/made, made 14 May 2014, coming into force 14 days after it was made, read 16 September 2026.
A separate Order, with a separate Schedule, imposing the price floor. Paragraph 1: "A relevant person shall ensure that no alcohol is sold or supplied for consumption on or off the premises for a price which is less than the permitted price." Paragraph 2 defines the permitted price by a formula in which "P is the permitted price", "D is the amount of duty chargeable in relation to the alcohol as if the duty were charged on the date of the sale or supply of the alcohol" and "V is the rate of value added tax chargeable". Paragraph 3 requires the result to be "rounded up to the nearest penny". Paragraph 4 gives fourteen days of grace after a duty or VAT change. The "relevant person" is wider than an owner expects: the premises licence holder, the designated premises supervisor, "the personal licence holder who makes or authorises a supply of alcohol under such a licence", and for a club any member or officer present in a capacity enabling them to prevent the supply.
One caution the skill states rather than hides. Paragraph 2(a) provides that "duty" is to be construed in accordance with the Alcoholic Liquor Duties Act 1979, and the duty regime for alcoholic products has since been reformed. The skill therefore instructs that the duty figure be taken from the current published HMRC rates with their effective date recorded, and that the resulting floor be treated as an input for the owner's accountant and licensing officer to confirm rather than as a settled number.
Where the skill departs: the skill uses this Order only as a floor test on the offer in front of it. It does not explain the policy, and it does not cite the Home Office's detailed below-cost guidance, which was withdrawn and archived.
3. Home Office, "Revised guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 (September 2026) - accessible version"
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/explanatory-memorandum-revised-guidance-issued-under-s-182-of-licensing-act-2003/revised-guidance-issued-under-section-182-of-the-licensing-act-2003-september-2026-accessible-version, publication page published 13 October 2014 and last updated 15 September 2026, read 16 September 2026.
The statutory guidance that licensing authorities must have regard to. It converts the Order's abstractions into examples, which is what an owner actually needs.
On drinking games, paragraph 10.39: "Drinking games which require or encourage individuals to drink a quantity of alcohol within a time limit, or drink as much alcohol as possible within a time limit or otherwise, are prohibited. For example, this may include organised 'drink downing' competitions. This would not prevent the responsible person from requiring all drinks to be consumed or abandoned at, or before, the closing time of the premises. Nor does it necessarily prohibit 'happy hours' as long as these are not designed to encourage individuals to drink excessively or rapidly." That last sentence is the one owners most need, because the belief that happy hours are banned is widespread and wrong.
On quantities, paragraph 10.40 names the cases, "a promotion which offers women free drinks before a certain time or 'all you can drink for £10'", and then offers the fix: "A common sense approach is encouraged, which may include specifying the quantity of alcohol included in it or not targeting a group which could become more vulnerable or present a greater risk of crime and disorder as a result of excessive alcohol consumption." On prizes, paragraph 10.41 names "'Buy one and get two free' and 'Buy one cocktail and get a second cocktail for 25p'". On dispensing, paragraph 10.43 names the "dentist's chair" and adds that the condition "may also prevent a premises from allowing another body to promote its products by employing someone to dispense alcohol directly into customers' mouths", which catches a supplier's brand activation as much as a venue's own game. Paragraph 10.73 then confirms that promotions remain lawful "as long as they are compatible with any other licensing condition that may be in force", provided the price is not less than the permitted price.
Where the skill departs: the guidance is 148 pages and the skill takes part of one chapter. It does not advise on reviews, representations or hearings, and where an offer has already attracted police attention the skill's answer is a solicitor, not a further paragraph of guidance.
4. Committee of Advertising Practice, CAP Code (Edition 12), Section 18 "Alcohol"
https://www.asa.org.uk/type/non_broadcast/code_section/18.html, no publication date shown on the page, read 16 September 2026.
The advertising half of the job, and a separate regulator from the licensing authority with a separate test. Its definition sets the scope wider than owners expect: the rules apply to marketing communications for alcoholic drinks and to communications "that feature or refer to alcoholic drinks, including where a soft drink is promoted as a mixer", and "Where an ad for a drink at or below 0.5% has the effect of promoting an alcoholic drink, these rules apply in full."
Two rules do the work in step 7. Rule 18.1: "Marketing communications must be socially responsible and must contain nothing that is likely to lead people to adopt styles of drinking that are unwise. For example, they should not encourage excessive drinking." Rule 18.10: "Marketing communications that include a promotion must not imply, condone or encourage excessive consumption of alcohol." Rule 18.11 adds that they "must not feature alcohol being handled or served irresponsibly", which is the one that catches a video of the offer being poured.
Where the skill departs: Section 18 carries twenty-four rules, including the under-18 appeal rules, the 25% media threshold and the featuring-under-25s rule at 18.16. A venue's board and its own social page are a narrower exposure than a brand's media buy, and the skill teaches the three rules most likely to strike out an offer rather than the full section.
5. Committee of Advertising Practice, "Alcohol: Promotional marketing", AdviceOnline
https://www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/alcohol-promotional-marketing.html, dated 28 July 2025 on the page, read 16 September 2026.
The most directly useful page in the set, because it is written about promotions specifically and it names rulings. Its own caveat matters: "This advice is given by the CAP Executive about non-broadcast advertising. It does not constitute legal advice." It supplies the promotional rule that sits beside the alcohol ones, rule 8.5: "Promotions must not be socially undesirable to the audience addressed by encouraging excessive consumption or irresponsible use." It supplies the worked unit arithmetic that step 7 copies: a 2018 upheld ruling about a restaurant menu offering a "barrow of booze", where the advertiser said it was designed for parties of fifteen or more, and "a party of 15 equated to 12 units per person in one sitting, which the ASA considered excessive when taking official health guidelines into account". It records a 2021 ruling about two social videos captioned "LEAVING A BOTTOMLESS BRUNCH LIKE", where the ASA "considered the ads were incitements to attend the events advertised and drink excessively, and normalised this style of consumption" even though neither video featured alcohol. And it records that promoters "should also ensure that the duration of the promotion is long enough to allow consumers to participate without drinking excessively or irresponsibly".
It also carries the regional warning in step 9: "The Alcohol etc. (Scotland) Act 2010 introduced a number of restrictions on discounts and special offers related to alcohol products", and "from 6 April 2023, marketers in Northern Ireland are not able to offer loyalty schemes (collection or redemption of points) on alcohol (0.5% ABV or above)", with promoters "urged to seek legal advice" in both cases.
Where the skill departs: the page's guidance on media targeting, the 25% under-18 audience threshold and social sharing mechanics is summarised in one line rather than taught, because the skill's job is to stop the offer being unlawful before anyone optimises a media plan. The skill also does not reproduce the older rulings the page cites from 2001 to 2015, which it could not open individually, beyond the descriptions given on this page and attributed to it.
6. Advertising Standards Authority, "ASA Ruling on Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits"
https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/sazerac-uk-ltd-a26-1325564-sazerac-uk-ltd.html, complaint reference A26-1325564, published 1 April 2026, the ad is described as seen in January 2026, read 16 September 2026.
Upheld on a single complaint, and the cleanest recent demonstration that the wording is the offence. The ad is described in the ruling: "A poster for Fireball, an alcoholic drink, seen on a bus stop in January 2026. Large text stated, 'FIREBALL' and 'GO FOR THE DOUBLE!' above an image of a bottle of the product, two full shot glasses and a dartboard with a dart in the double-20."
The advertiser's defence is the defence every clever drinks line has. They said the phrase "was a commonly understood darts expression", that darts "was an established pub pastime in the UK and was inherently social rather than competitive", and that even if both glasses were drunk by one person "that would equate to two standard units consumed sequentially, which was not itself irresponsible or excessive".
The ASA accepted the darts meaning and upheld anyway: "We considered that 'double' was a widely used term in relation to spirits, and that most consumers would commonly understand that it referred to a double measurement of alcohol." It noted that the overflowing glasses "suggested abundance and excess rather than a standard measurement", that the ad "did not include anything to indicate the 'double' was limited to a single drink or that consumers should stop after one double measure", and concluded: "Regardless of the number of units being consumed, we considered that the overall impression encouraged excessive drinking." The breach was of rule 18.1. That last sentence is why step 8 reads for the second meaning before it reads for wit: a unit count is not a defence, and the intention behind the joke is not the test.
Where the skill departs: this is a national brand's out-of-home poster, not a chalkboard outside a pub, and the skill does not imply that a venue faces comparable scrutiny. It uses the ruling for the method and not for the severity.
7. The Portman Group, "Code of Practice on the Naming, Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks, Sixth Edition (Amended)"
https://portmangroup21.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Portman-Group-NPP-Sixth-Edition-Amended.pdf, no publication date shown on the document, read 16 September 2026, linked from https://www.portmangroup.org.uk/codes-of-practice/.
Included because owners assume this Code binds them and mostly it does not, and knowing exactly where it does is worth more than a general warning. Paragraph 1.3 applies the Code to "the naming, packaging, marketing and promotional activity undertaken by a drink's producer". Paragraph 1.4 provides that it "does not apply to wholesaler or retailer-led promotional materials and activities" unless the retailer is itself a producer promoting its own products, or "they are part of any co-promotional activity that has the approval or support of the producer". Definition 2.4 defines co-promotional activity as "marketing activity between a producer and retailer or wholesaler, which has taken place with the approval or support of a producer, even if that activity is predominantly retailer or wholesaler-led". A footnote confirms the boundary from the other side: "Alcoholic drinks served in the on-trade that are neither pre-packaged nor covered under the definition of co-promotional activity are outside the remit of the Code."
So a pub's own cocktail name is outside the Code, and the same pub running a supplier-funded promotion with the supplier's artwork is inside it. Definition 2.5 extends the meaning of "drink" in the on-trade to any alcoholic drink served as part of producer-led or producer-approved activity, and adds that this "also includes a barrel (i.e. a draught drink) or permanent dispenser unit (drink fount)". Rule 3.2 then lists what such activity must not do, including that it must not "encourage illegal, irresponsible or immoderate consumption, such as drink-driving, binge-drinking or drunkenness" or "urge the consumer to drink rapidly or to 'down' a product in one". Paragraph 6.3 adds the sanction: the Portman Group may notify retailers by a Retailer Alert Bulletin "and request them not to replenish stocks of any product whose packaging has been found in breach of the Code", and footnote 26 records that section 182 guidance invites licensing authorities to consider conditions requiring compliance with those bulletins.
Where the skill departs: the Independent Complaints Panel's decisions and the bulletins themselves sit behind a script-driven index on portmangroup.org.uk, and no individual decision or bulletin could be loaded on 16 September 2026, so none is cited and no product is named. The Portman Group's page explaining the sanction, https://www.portmangroup.org.uk/retailer-alert-bulletins/, did load and states that signatories are asked "not to replenish stock after three months of the RAB being published", and that "Retailers who continue to stock a product in receipt of a RAB could be in breach of the Licensing Act which is enforced by Trading Standards."
Best public prompt we found for this job
The closest public artefact is the `brand-review` skill in Anthropic's `knowledge-work-plugins` repository, raw source at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/main/marketing/skills/brand-review/SKILL.md, loaded on 16 September 2026. The repository has 24,124 stars, read from api.github.com on 16 September 2026.
It is the right comparison because it does the same shape of job: take a finished piece of copy, test it against a written standard, and return findings "by severity with specific before/after fixes". Its own description names the category this skill lives in, "screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags", and the discipline of returning the offending sentence alongside the standard it breaks is taken straight across into the wording-check table. We also kept the thing many review prompts omit, which is naming the standard in the finding: here that is a rule number or ruling reference on every struck line, and a struck line without one is itself a failure the skill reports.
What we changed, and it is the whole difference. A brand guideline is a preference and a licence condition is not. The public skill grades findings by severity so a writer can decide what to fix; this skill has no severity column, because a prohibited activity is not a matter of degree and there is no version of an all-you-can-drink offer that is mildly non-compliant. Its before-and-after format is dropped for the mechanic as well: the public skill's instinct is to rewrite the sentence, and rewriting the sentence on an offer that encourages people to drink quickly changes the evidence rather than the offer. That is why this skill separates the mechanic test from the wording test and refuses to let a rewrite close a failed mechanic.
Want this running in your business?
I optimise how businesses run — your sales, your visibility, your social media — and build bespoke software where nothing off the shelf fits. The first conversation is free. Work starts from £150 a day.
Foxera