Turn tables faster without rushing anyone: 10 AI skills for the waitlist
capacity-and-covers-forecast
staff and stock for the covers actually coming, not last year's rota
How the two work together
Claude thinks it through. Paste the Claude prompt into Claude Code, or drop the folder into your skills folder. Claude does the judgement: what to look for, what is worth doing, what is right.
Codex gets it done. At the hand-off point Claude runs Codex on your machine with one command and passes it the Codex prompt. Codex does the mechanical part and hands the result back. Claude checks it before you see it.
No API key to set up: Claude calls the Codex you already have installed. If Codex is not installed, Claude does that half itself and tells you.
Prompt for Claude
--- name: capacity-and-covers-forecast description: Builds a covers and staffing forecast from the venue's own booking history, checked against the current direction of the national eating-out market, rather than from last year's rota copied forward. Reads whether the sector is growing or shrinking from the latest published trackers, and flags where the venue's own trend moves against the published direction, the point where a forecast built on habit stops being safe to trust. Use when setting covers, staffing or stock for an upcoming period, or checking your trend against the wider market. --- # Staff and stock for the covers actually coming Give it the venue's covers and sales for recent weeks. Get back a forecast for the coming period, checked against the latest published sector direction, with a flag wherever the venue's trend moves opposite to it. ## What it does 1. **Start from the venue's own recent numbers**, never a rota copied forward unchanged. 2. **Check that figure against the latest published sector tracker.** The NIQ RSM Hospitality Business Tracker reported restaurant groups' sales "down by 0.7% year-on-year in June", called "their second-worst month" of 2026. 3. **Use a second, independent tracker to confirm direction**, since one report can be a blip. Lumina Intelligence's panel found, for the four weeks to early February 2026, "eating out participation edged up to 57.9% (+0.4ppts year-on-year)", "visit frequency rose sharply (+7.3%)", and "average spend jumped +9.4% to £17.86 per visit." 4. **Name any gap, don't smooth over it.** Where the venue rises while the trackers show a falling period, or vice versa, record it as a flagged gap rather than quietly averaging the two. 5. **Turn the forecast into covers per shift**, with staffing and stock as a separate, explicit step built from that figure. 6. **Reforecast on a stated cycle**, not once a quarter from memory; both trackers used here publish monthly. ## Then it checks 1. The base figure is drawn from the venue's own recent history, with the date range stated. 2. At least one sector tracker figure is recorded alongside it, with source and date. 3. Any gap between venue and tracker direction is named explicitly. 4. The forecast is expressed as covers per shift, with staffing as a separate step. 5. A reforecast date is set. Any check fails: redo that step once. Failed twice: say what is wrong and stop. ## Rules - Public information only. Never invent a fact, number or quote. Anything sent in someone's name says whose name it is. - Never present one tracker's figure as "the market"; use at least two independent readings. - Never quietly blend the venue's trend into the sector figure; a gap is recorded, not averaged away. - Working document for the owner to check against their own records. Not a guaranteed prediction. ## Built from - NIQ RSM Hospitality Business Tracker, rsmuk.com/insights/hospitality-business-tracker, June 2026 trading, read 4 Nov 2026: step 2. - FRY Magazine, reporting Lumina Intelligence's Eating and Drinking Out Panel, frymagazine.com, published 28 Apr 2026, read 4 Nov 2026: step 3.
Prompt for Codex
# capacity-and-covers-forecast ## You are given The venue's own covers and sales history for recent weeks, by date. The forecast period to plan for (dates). The latest published sector tracker figures, already supplied by Claude: tracker name, the year-on-year direction and figure, the date range it covers, and the date it was read. A second, independent tracker's figures in the same form, where available. The reforecast cycle (for example, monthly), set by the owner. ## Produce Write into a `./capacity-and-covers-forecast-output/` folder: 1. `venue-trend.csv` with columns: `week_start`, `covers`, `sales_gbp`, `week_on_week_covers_change_percent`, `trend_direction`. `trend_direction` is `rising`, `falling` or `flat`, calculated from the covers trend across the supplied weeks. 2. `sector-trackers.csv` with columns: `tracker_name`, `producer`, `period_covered`, `direction`, `figure_verbatim`, `date_read`. One row per tracker supplied. 3. `forecast.csv` with columns: `forecast_period_start`, `forecast_period_end`, `base_covers_per_shift`, `basis_description`, `reforecast_date`. `basis_description` states in one line which weeks of venue history the base figure was drawn from. 4. `gap-check.csv` with columns: `venue_trend_direction`, `tracker_1_direction`, `tracker_2_direction`, `gap_found`, `gap_description`. `gap_found` is `yes` where the venue's direction differs from either tracker's direction, otherwise `no`. 5. `gaps.md` - a numbered list of: any `gap_found` row of `yes`, restated with the directions involved; any tracker row missing a `date_read`; any forecast with no `reforecast_date` set; any venue-trend row with a missing `sales_gbp` or `covers` value. ## Rules - Codex calculates and records. It never decides the forecast's base covers figure beyond the stated calculation from supplied history, and never explains away a gap between the venue and the trackers - that explanation, if any, is supplied by the owner and recorded separately, not invented here. - Never report a sector tracker figure without its producer, period covered and date read. - Trend directions and gaps are calculated exactly from the supplied figures, never estimated. - Use British English, GBP and DD Month YYYY dates. No em dashes in any file you write; flag any supplied text containing one in `gaps.md`. - Every file ends with this line: this is a working document prepared for the owner to check against their own booking and sales records, and is not a prediction guaranteed to hold for any specific week. ## Return The absolute path of each file written and the row count of each CSV. The venue's own trend direction and the figure it was calculated from. Each sector tracker's direction, figure and date read. The forecast's base covers per shift and its reforecast date. The gap-check result and description if a gap was found. The `gaps.md` item count.
Built from the best public work on this
Sources for capacity-and-covers-forecast
Everything below was opened and read on 4 November 2026.
1. NIQ RSM Hospitality Business Tracker, "World Cup lifts pubs but restaurant sales dip in flat June for hospitality"
https://www.rsmuk.com/insights/hospitality-business-tracker/world-cup-lifts-pubs-but-restaurant-sales-dip-in-flat-june-for-hospitality, covering June 2026 trading, read 4 November 2026.
The tracker is "produced by NIQ (NielsenIQ), powered by CGA intelligence, in association with RSM." It reports that "restaurant groups' sales were down by 0.7% year-on-year in June, making it their second-worst month of 2026." The page carries no separate publication date beyond the June 2026 trading period it covers.
Used in step 2, as the first of two independent sector readings a venue's own covers forecast is checked against.
Where the skill departs: the tracker reports sales value for restaurant groups generally; it does not break the figure down by region, cuisine type, or independent-versus-chain operator, so the skill treats it as a general market-direction signal rather than a figure specific to any one venue's segment.
2. FRY Magazine, reporting Lumina Intelligence's Eating and Drinking Out Panel
https://frymagazine.com/?p=12496, published 28 April 2026 by Helen Edmonds, read 4 November 2026.
Reports, for the four weeks ending in early February 2026, that UK "eating out participation edged up to 57.9% (+0.4ppts year-on-year)," that "visit frequency rose sharply (+7.3%)," and that "average spend jumped +9.4% to £17.86 per visit," citing Lumina Intelligence's EDOP research.
Used in step 3, as the second independent sector reading, deliberately drawn from an earlier point in 2026 than source 1, which is what makes the comparison in step 3 meaningful: the two trackers, read together, show the sector's direction moving between the two periods rather than describe one static state.
Where the skill departs: this article is a trade-magazine report of Lumina Intelligence's data, not Lumina's own release, so the skill records the figures as reported by FRY Magazine with that attribution, rather than presenting them as Lumina's primary publication.
Best public prompt we found for this job
The closest public artefact is the `metrics-review` skill in Anthropic's `knowledge-work-plugins` repository, raw source at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/main/product-management/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md. The repository has 34,655 stars, read from api.github.com on 4 November 2026. It is a product-metrics review skill, not a hospitality forecasting skill, but the job has the same shape: read real numbers, compare them against a benchmark, and never let a figure stand without something to measure it against.
The useful part is its one-line discipline: "Absolute numbers without context are useless." We took that directly into the gap-check step: a venue's own covers trend is not reported on its own, and a sector tracker's figure is never reported on its own either; each is shown against the other so a reader can see whether the venue is moving with or against the wider market.
We did not copy two things. `metrics-review` is built around a single connected analytics tool supplying live numbers on request; a hospitality venue's covers history usually lives in a booking system export or a till report that has to be supplied by hand, so this skill is built to work from whatever history the owner can actually produce, not to assume a live feed exists. And `metrics-review` organises everything into a North Star and tiered metric hierarchy designed for a product organisation; a covers forecast has no equivalent hierarchy to build, because the only two numbers that matter are what the venue itself is trending and what the published market is doing, which is why this skill stays to two trackers and one venue figure rather than importing a larger metrics framework it does not need.
Want this running in your business?
I optimise how businesses run — your sales, your visibility, your social media — and build bespoke software where nothing off the shelf fits. The first conversation is free. Work starts from £150 a day.
Foxera